<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rene Girard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://payingattentiontothesky.com/2010/02/04/rene-girard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://payingattentiontothesky.com/2010/02/04/rene-girard/</link>
	<description>No one was paying attention to the sky...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 19:26:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neal Freedman</title>
		<link>http://payingattentiontothesky.com/2010/02/04/rene-girard/#comment-1218</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neal Freedman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 07:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://payingattentiontothesky.com/?p=1744#comment-1218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While Girard identifies a (scapegoating) crowd (correctly,I believe), the Bible, eg. John, identifies &quot;the Jews&quot; as constituting that crowd. The scapegoat mechanism which Girard describes cannot, it seems to me, be the same one &quot;revealed&quot; in the Bible except by overlooking what would appear - please correct me - to be an accusation against a group as such, not an instance of humanity&#039;s violence. In Girardian terms would this not be an example of concealing the nature of violence - by insinuating that its origins are, well, tribal. Peter&#039;s denial is an exemplary story of the individual tempted to join in a lie. The individuals who give in to it - serial Peters you might say - may justify themselves in the name of the group (&quot;we Jews&quot;, &quot;we Christians&quot;, the examples are potentially endless), but this is the ultimate (crucial)lie which Girard claims the Bible reveals.Yet the Bible seems to repeat it in the example I offer here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Girard identifies a (scapegoating) crowd (correctly,I believe), the Bible, eg. John, identifies &#8220;the Jews&#8221; as constituting that crowd. The scapegoat mechanism which Girard describes cannot, it seems to me, be the same one &#8220;revealed&#8221; in the Bible except by overlooking what would appear &#8211; please correct me &#8211; to be an accusation against a group as such, not an instance of humanity&#8217;s violence. In Girardian terms would this not be an example of concealing the nature of violence &#8211; by insinuating that its origins are, well, tribal. Peter&#8217;s denial is an exemplary story of the individual tempted to join in a lie. The individuals who give in to it &#8211; serial Peters you might say &#8211; may justify themselves in the name of the group (&#8220;we Jews&#8221;, &#8220;we Christians&#8221;, the examples are potentially endless), but this is the ultimate (crucial)lie which Girard claims the Bible reveals.Yet the Bible seems to repeat it in the example I offer here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

